Originally posted by
heeroluva at "Suspicious comments" and "Spam comments": LJ decision to 'block' spam is a big FAIL!
So I've been noticing in both my own journal and communities that I haven't been able to see some comments even thought it says there are more comments there than are actually showing up. Instead I'm getting a place holder that says (Spam comment) or (Suspicious comment).
Why are these showing up like this you may ask? In their rush to fight spam LJ has created a new filter that're AUTOMATICALLY TURNED ON in ALL journals and communities, which screens comments that are made with 'suspicious links' ie links that are not on their safe whitelist, so pretty much the majority of the internet. There is no noted way to add to the 'whitelist'.
What really gets me is that they didn't inform people that they were doing this until a week after it was done and that it was automatically turned on.
So how do I turn it off you might ask.
That's simple. Go to your Settings, click on the Privacy tab, and half way down where it says Spam Protection uncheck the box next to "Comments containing a link to a non-whitelisted domain will be marked as spam and moved to a special section." This applies to both personal journal and communities and the opinion has to be manually changed in each one.
While I understand how this could be a good idea, I think they went about it in a very backhanded way, and have implemented it poorly. There was no message to anyone that the link has been screened. It's automatically done. This went on for over a week before they said anything about it. There is still nothing in the FAQs about it even. The only way I found out about this way going through the support pages where people were reporting similar issues.
Please share this!
ETA: This links really illustrates the problems.
Why are these showing up like this you may ask? In their rush to fight spam LJ has created a new filter that're AUTOMATICALLY TURNED ON in ALL journals and communities, which screens comments that are made with 'suspicious links' ie links that are not on their safe whitelist, so pretty much the majority of the internet. There is no noted way to add to the 'whitelist'.
What really gets me is that they didn't inform people that they were doing this until a week after it was done and that it was automatically turned on.
So how do I turn it off you might ask.
That's simple. Go to your Settings, click on the Privacy tab, and half way down where it says Spam Protection uncheck the box next to "Comments containing a link to a non-whitelisted domain will be marked as spam and moved to a special section." This applies to both personal journal and communities and the opinion has to be manually changed in each one.
While I understand how this could be a good idea, I think they went about it in a very backhanded way, and have implemented it poorly. There was no message to anyone that the link has been screened. It's automatically done. This went on for over a week before they said anything about it. There is still nothing in the FAQs about it even. The only way I found out about this way going through the support pages where people were reporting similar issues.
Please share this!
ETA: This links really illustrates the problems.
no subject
Date: 26/04/2011 23:03 (UTC)Speaking of which... woah, crazy amount of new options for posting comments! From LJ, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID... what is in this insanity. XD
no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:02 (UTC)For the many logins. It'd be great, but I don't thing there are many people without LJ that read and comment at LJ. OpenID it's great, so you can comment from a Dreamwitdh and vthe other way round, but what about FB?
Bah. -.-
no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:07 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:18 (UTC)But yeah, those two are taking over the world. Do you remember the fuss when, some months ago, LJ had the wonderfully idiotic idea to let the comments be crossposted to FB (and by doing so letting comments to protected post to be viewable even outside LJ friend filters)?
Instead of fixing other things (the absurd coding, anyone?) they're trying to make LJ more FBable, which kinda suck. :(
no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:23 (UTC)Long live LJ. As long as it doesn't change into FaceBook II ^^"
no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 20:28 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 21:50 (UTC)Damn, I feel old everytime I say I'm not all for FB: don't know there in Canada, but here in Italy you are supposed to be all crazy about FB or you're notbody and nothing.
no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 21:56 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27/04/2011 22:04 (UTC)I admit the reason why FB was build in the first place wasn't bad per se (find your long forgotten relatives around the world, friends you lost because they moved etc), but now that site is shitty, all people online instead of working, everyone "stalking" everyone, and those idiots games... =_=